Legal Opinion
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Krumbein
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Harold Hyman J.
Petitioner, Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company (Hartford) moved to "stay arbitration” demanded by its assured, Louis Krumbein, and Miriam Krumbein by notice dated November 11, 1976 and received by it on November 15, 1976.
The demand for arbitration is based upon a policy issued by Hartford to Krumbein, effective from April 15, 1974 to April 15, 1975, and resulting from a three-car collision on November 26, 1974. The "demand” is made pursuant to the "uninsured motorist” provision of the policy afore-mentioned. The facts are simple, and as follows:
One, Michael S. Slakter…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Messing v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
- Nassau Insurance v. Lion InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Argenzio v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1971
- In re the Arbitration between American Empire Insurance & Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Nassau Insurance & EppsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Gannon v. New York Mutual UnderwritersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Jimenez v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023