Legal Opinion

McGuinness v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 22, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to declare that the plaintiff Thomas McGuinness is an insured “ relative ” within the meaning of the New York Automobile Accident Indemnification Endorsement affixed to a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by the defendant Hanover Insurance Company to the coplaintiff Theodore Fereance (who is alleged to be the father-in-law of and to reside with the said plaintiff McGuinness), the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated August 15, 1962, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of Met. Life Ins. Co. v. ConwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Janneck v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  3. Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1943
  4. Suslensky v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  5. Berkshire Life Insurance v. WeinigNew York Court of Appeals · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. GellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Neuman v. Westchester Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Smith v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API