Legal Opinion

Nebraska Natl. Bank v. Logan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1892Published

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J. cited: Titus v. Merchants Bank, 35 N. J. L., 588; Bussell v. Hankey, 6 Term Rep. [Eng.], 12; Griffin v. Bice, 1 Hilt. [N. Y.], 184; People v. Merchants Bank, 78 N. Y., 269; Fonner v. Smith, 31 Neb., 107; Freeholders v. State Bank, 32 N. J. Eq., 467. cited: Allen v. Bank, 22 Wend. [N. Y.], 215; Striessguth v. Bank, 44 N. W. Rep. £Minn.], 797; Exchange Bank v.. Third Natl.

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Douglas county. Tried below before Hopewell, J. cited: Titus v. Merchants Bank, 35 N. J. L., 588; Bussell v. Hankey, 6 Term Rep. [Eng.], 12; Griffin v. Bice, 1 Hilt. [N. Y.], 184; People v. Merchants Bank, 78 N. Y., 269; Fonner v. Smith, 31 Neb., 107; Freeholders v. State Bank, 32 N. J. Eq., 467. cited: Allen v. Bank, 22 Wend. [N. Y.], 215; Striessguth v. Bank, 44 N. W. Rep. £Minn.], 797; Exchange Bank v.. Third Natl. Bank, 112 U. S., 276; Beeves v. Bank, 8 O. St., 465; Simpson v. Waldby, 30 N. W. Rep. [Mich.], 199; Titus v. Merchants Bank, 35 N. J. L., 588; 1…

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

The petition in this case was submitted on demurrer in the year 1890 and the petition sustained. In that case the demurrer was overruled and the cause remanded for further proceedings, it being held that if the facts stated in the petition were true the plaintiff had shown due diligence and Was entitled to recover. (Bank v. Logan, 29 Neb., 278.) Upon the case being remanded, an answer was duly filed by the defendants Logan & Stanton, to which a reply was made. No answer appears to h.ave been filed by McCord, Brady & Co., and on the trial of the cause the case was dismissed by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nebraska National Bank v. LoganNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API