State v. Rutzinski
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJon P. Wilcox, J.
¶ 1. This case requires us to decide under what circumstances a cell-phone call from an unidentified motorist provides sufficient justification for an investigative traffic stop. Relying on information obtained from such a call, a Greendale police officer, Jerome Sardina (Officer Sardina), made an investigative traffic stop of the petitioner, Paul Rutzinski (Rutzinski). During this stop, Officer Sardina obtained evidence that Rutzinski was operating his motor vehicle while intoxicated.
¶ 2. Rutzinski subsequently moved to suppress the evidence obtained during the traffic stop, arguing that the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- People v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- Jackson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 2004
- United States v. Wade Allen WheatCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- State of Iowa v. Leon KooimaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.