Legal Opinion

Cohen v. Lieberman

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 17, 1936Published

1Opinion of the CourtGarside, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment against defendant Nathan Lieberman, who, in turn, makes a cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to him. The sole question before the court appears to be whether or no a stepfather in the circumstances here presented can be held hable for necessaries furnished to a stepchild. The defendants are husband and wife. The wife was originally sued alone and she defeated a motion for summary judgment brought against her by making an affidavit in which she stated that “ the work was done at the request . and with the knowledge and consent of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. . HutchinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  2. Frank v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Syczyk v. SzczerbaniewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API