McNulty v. Windham
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fishburne.
The respondent, H. D. Windham, is a tenant occupying the premises known as Marmac Hotel Barbershop, in the City of Columbia. The appellant brought this proceeding under Section 8813 of the Code 1932, before a magistrate in Richland County, to dispossess the tenant upon the ground that he was a tenant at will holding' over. The matter was heard by the magistrate and a jury on July 7, 1936, and resulted in a verdict for the appellant for the possession of the premises. Thereafter the respondent appealed to the Court of Common Pleas…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. RodemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
- Maynard v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
- Jones v. Spartanburg Herald Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colonial Oil Co. v. American Oil Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1942
- Croft v. FaustSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
- Seibels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Bruce v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947