Legal Opinion

McNulty v. Windham

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 9, 1937No. 14434PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Fishburne.

The respondent, H. D. Windham, is a tenant occupying the premises known as Marmac Hotel Barbershop, in the City of Columbia. The appellant brought this proceeding under Section 8813 of the Code 1932, before a magistrate in Richland County, to dispossess the tenant upon the ground that he was a tenant at will holding' over. The matter was heard by the magistrate and a jury on July 7, 1936, and resulted in a verdict for the appellant for the possession of the premises. Thereafter the respondent appealed to the Court of Common Pleas…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. RodemanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
  2. Maynard v. CampbellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1920
  3. Jones v. Spartanburg Herald Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colonial Oil Co. v. American Oil Co.District Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1942
  2. Croft v. FaustSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
  3. Seibels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
  4. Bruce v. LynchSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API