Legal Opinion

Duke Power Co. v. Rutland

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 12, 1932No. 3179Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

J. H. Marion, of Charlotte, N. C. (C. C. Wyehe, Donald Russell, and Sam J. Nieholls, all of Spartanburg, S. C., on the brief), for appellant and cross-appellee.

Horace L. Bomar and Jesse W. Boyd, both of Spartanburg, S. C., for appellee and cross-appellant.

SOPER, Circuit Judge.,

A point has been raised upon the rehearing of this cause, not raised upon the original hearing, viz., that the right to claim compensation for the taking by the power company was a personal right belonging to the owner of the land at the time of the taking, which did not pass to the plaintiff Rut-land. We…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Kindred v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Cureton v. South Bound R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
  4. Cayce Land Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  5. Bridges v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API