Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Laney

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 6, 1999PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAKIN, J.:

¶ 1 Paul Laney appeals from the judgment of sentence entered after a jury convicted him of aggravated assault, recklessly endangering another person, and illegal possession, use or control of a firearm. We affirm.

¶ 2 The learned trial court aptly summarized the facts:

On July 12, 1997, Kenneth Zeigler was assigned as a fire policeman to protect pedestrians at a demolition site of Andy’s Bar on the corner of North Pitt Street and West North Street in the Borough of Carlisle. For years that street corner and the surrounding area has been infamous for street level drug dealing. In the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. McNeil v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Illinois v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TaggartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. MettsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Com. v. Jefferson, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. Com. v. Jefferson, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API