Legal Opinion

Waddell v. Edison Chouest Offshore

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided March 20, 2015No. Civil Action No. G-14-170PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER OF REMAND

MELINDA HARMON, District Judge.

The above referenced cause, alleging negligence and gross negligence and seeking damages under the Jones Act, 46 U.S.C. § 30104, general maritime law, and the “saving to suitors clause,” 28. U.S.C. § 1333, for injuries Plaintiff Tyrell Waddell (“Waddell”) allegedly suffered when he was electrocuted by a defective electrical relay while working in navigable waters on board a vessel owned by Defendant Edison Chouest Offshore (“ESO”)1 and operated by Chevron USA, Inc. (“Chevron”), was filed on April 6, 2014, served on Chevron on April 24,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
Manguno v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
Jerome B. Grubart, Inc. v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Langlois v. Kirby Inland Marine, LPDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2015