Legal Opinion

Shuey v. Hoffman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 29, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Willis

Affirming.

This appeal involves the propriety of a ruling refusing to file a reply.

if the rejected pleading was legally sufficient to subvert the defense presented by the answer to which it was addressed, it should have been filed. If, however, it was not substantially sufficient for that purpose, its rejection involved no error. The legal sufficiency of a pleading may be tested by an objection to the filing thereof; the objection being treated as a general demurrer thereto. Brady v. Peck, 99 Ky. 42, 34 S. W. 906, 35 S. W. 623, 17 Ky. Law Rep. 1356; C., N. O.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. ShueyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Sowders v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Gridler v. Farmers & Drovers' BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  4. Wing v. DuganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
  5. Wren v. CookseyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dugan v. LongCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Schneider v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Blanton v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  4. Hofgesang v. SilverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  5. Shuey v. HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API