Legal Opinion

State v. Richey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1926No. 27364PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The two defendants were convicted of knowingly receiving stolen property, and, from a sentence of a term in the penitentiary, prosecute this appeal.

The property as set out in the original indictment was simply described as Ford- automobile parts.

In response to a request for a more specific description, the property was alleged to consist of four auto car wheels, three auto tires, four tubes, two auto headlights, one car floor mat, two seat covers, one generator and one starter for Ford automobile, one automobile horn, Ford automobile coils, and one automobile battery.

When the state, on trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. FreddySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  2. State v. AllemandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  3. State v. CoxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
  4. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  2. State v. YoungSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1966
  3. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1964
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API