Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Burnetti

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 1989No. A89A0656Published

1DissentBanke, Presiding Judge

1. By its holding in this case, the court has effectively eliminated the words, “as a result of being struck by the owner’s motor vehicle,” from OCGA § 33-34-7 (a) (3), thereby holding, in effect, that no-fault benefits may be recovered by any person who suffers an accidental bodily injury in this state in connection with the ownership, use or maintenance of an insured motor vehicle. This may or may not be an enlightened position as a matter of public policy, but it is unquestionably contrary to the plain wording of the statute.

Personal injury protection, or no-fault, insurance coverage was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  4. Chapman v. BurksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
  5. Rustin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API