United States v. Hurd
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW
2Per curiam
Our decision of 8 September 1975 was vacated and the case remanded to us by the Court of Military Appeals pending that Court’s disposition of related issues previously granted in United States v. Courtney, 24 U.S.C.M.A. 280, 51 C.M.R. 796, 1 M.J. 438 (C.M.A.1976); United States v. Jackson, 3 M.J. 101 (C.M.A.1977); and United States v. Graves, 2 M.J. 1001 (A.C.M.R. 29 September 1976), affirmed by Order, 3 M.J. 186 (C.M.A.1977).*
*736In Courtney the Court of Military Appeals determined that Courtney was denied equal protection of the law because his drug offense…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. CourtneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. JacksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. JacksonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. GravesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976