Commonwealth v. Armstrong
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KAUFFMAN, Justice.
The issue presented by this appeal is whether a person who successfully completes an Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition Program (“ARD”) is entitled to have his or her record of arrest expunged. 1 For the reasons that follow, we conclude that the policy considerations underlying ARD mandate that unless the Commonwealth demonstrates an overriding societal interest in retaining that record, ex-pungement must be granted. Accordingly, we reverse and remand to the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County.
Appellant, Regina Armstrong, was arrested on February 1. 1976, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dale B. Menard v. John N. Mitchell and John Edgar HooverCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
- Commonwealth v. WexlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. MaloneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Wolfe v. BealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. RoseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Gilles v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- In Re Administrative Order No. 1-Md-2003Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. MotoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Cain v. Darby BoroughCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.