Legal Opinion

Cahall v. Derwinski

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided July 26, 1991No. 90-1082PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

FARLEY, Associate Judge:

Appellant, Jack R. Cahall, appeals from the June 15, 1990, Board of Veterans’ Appeals’ (Board) decision which affirmed the denial by the Regional Office (RO) for entitlement to service connection for residuals of a back and leg injury. A timely appeal to this Court followed. Following the filing of appellant’s brief, the Secretary filed a Motion for Summary Affirmance, for Acceptance of the Motion in Lieu of a Brief, and for a Stay of Proceedings Pending a Ruling on this Motion. The Secretary seeks summary affirmance arguing that the Board’s decision…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frankel v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cahall v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API