Legal Opinion

Cole National Corp. v. State Board of Examiners of Ophthalmic Dispensers & Ophthalmic Technicians

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 7, 1970PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Haneman, J.

Plaintiff challenges the validity of an administrative rule promulgated by defendant. The Appellate Division sustained the validity of the rule, 107 N. J. Super. 378 (1969). This Court granted plaintiff’s petition for certification, 55 N. J. 449 (1970).

Plaintiff, an Ohio corporation, is engaged in the manufacture and sale of eyeglasses, lenses, frames and related appurtenances. It conducts its business in 37 states and the District of Columbia at approximately 300 locations, 175 of which are in Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Sears) stores. Plaintiff…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce v. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Dougherty v. Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Lower Main Street Associates v. New Jersey Housing & Mortgage Finance AgencySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. NJ Chamb. Commerce v. NJ Elec. Law Enforce. Comm.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API