Legal Opinion

Russo v. Ballard Medical Products

District Court, D. Rhode Island

Decided January 10, 2005No. C.A. 03-519LPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LAGUEUX, Senior District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on the motion of Defendants Ballard Medical Products, Kimberly-Clark Worldwide, Inc., and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (collectively “Defendants”) to dismiss the Complaint for improper venue and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 1 The issue at the heart of this matter, is whether the forum selection clause contained in a Confidential Disclosure Agreement (“Agreement”) between Russo (“Plaintiff’) and Defendant Ballard Medical Products (“Ballard”), requires the venue of Russo’s theft of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. D'Antuono v. CCH Computax Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1983
  5. Hoffman v. Burroughs Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The Hipage Co., Inc. v. Access2Go, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  2. Roca-Buigas v. Clutch Sportz, LLCDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API