Hicks v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Australia Hicks appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree robbery and fixing his punishment at ten years’ imprisonment.
Hicks is a rather well-known female impersonator. He apparently plied the trade of enticing people, his customers, to engage in sexual misconduct with him. On August 16, 1975, he agreed to engage in a sexual act with Curtis Trent and in furtherance of that act took him to a room over the Soul Lounge. An argument developed over an increase in the amount Trent was to pay, and Trent, becoming apprehensive of the intentions of Hicks,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kennedy v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
- Merritt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thacker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Commonwealth v. McCombsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
- Fegley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
- Commonwealth v. PottsKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
- Stout v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.