Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Commonwealth

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1977PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Australia Hicks appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree robbery and fixing his punishment at ten years’ imprisonment.

Hicks is a rather well-known female impersonator. He apparently plied the trade of enticing people, his customers, to engage in sexual misconduct with him. On August 16, 1975, he agreed to engage in a sexual act with Curtis Trent and in furtherance of that act took him to a room over the Soul Lounge. An argument developed over an increase in the amount Trent was to pay, and Trent, becoming apprehensive of the intentions of Hicks,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Merritt v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1965

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thacker v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. McCombsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Fegley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. PottsKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stout v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API