Legal Opinion

Smith v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided February 2, 1978PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MATHERNE, Judge.

In this condemnation lawsuit the determinative issues on appeal are whether the trial judge can of his own motion in a civil law case impanel a jury to try the issues and whether a jury so impaneled is an “advisory jury.”

By plea filed on April 17, 1974, the defendants demanded a jury to hear this lawsuit. Thereafter the parties presented to the trial court an agreed order wherein all parties waived a jury trial and agreed that the lawsuit would be tried before the judge without a jury. The trial judge refused to sign the order and impaneled a jury to hear the issues.

The record…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hargrove v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  2. Firemen's Ins. Co. Of Newark, N.J. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. United Press Associations, a Corporation v. Sidney Dean Charles, Paul S. Charles and Patricia Charles and the Pioneer Printing Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. State Ex Rel. Webster v. DaughertyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  5. Hurt v. EarnhartCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arvil Holt, et a v. Zula PartonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API