Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Henderson

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 26, 2004No. 03-0470/NAPublished

1DissentCrawford, Chief Judge

The majority holds that the lesser-included charge of negligently hazarding a vessel was *355“fatally tainted” by the lack of jurisdiction for the greater charge. On the contrary, the convening authority’s derivatively defective referral of the lesser-included charge constituted waivable, nonjurisdictional error, which not only failed to prejudice Appellant, but actually benefited him. For this reason, I respectfully dissent from the lead opinion.

“[I]t is well established that a defective referral ... does not constitute jurisdictional error.” United States v. King, 28 M.J. 397, 399 (C.M.A.1989).…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. WilkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. JeterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. LopezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  4. United States v. BancroftUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. JosephUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API