Templeman's Administrator v. Pugh
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Eauquier county in action of assumpsit, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
A. B. Pugh, receiver, on the 26th day of December, 1900, instituted his action of assumpsit against the personal representative of James A. Templeman, deceased, to recover the sum of $1,250.00, alleged to be due from the said decedent’s estate on account of subscriptions to the stock of the Salem Loan and Beal Estate Investment Company, chartered under the laws of this State.
The defendant appeared and filed the plea of non-assumpsit, the plea of res judicata, and two pleas of the statute of limitations, one of three years, and the other of five years.
The plaintiff replied generally to the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Quackenbush v. IsleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Wright v. Eli Lilly & Co.Portsmouth County Circuit Court · 2004
- De Groff v. HunsickerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Wenke Ex Rel. Laufenberg v. Gehl Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.