Legal Opinion

Concerning the Application for Water Rights of Tidd: Frees v. Tidd

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 1, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 14SA234PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

11 This water case involving neighboring property owners in Saguache County presents an issue of first impression: -May the land owner whose property is burdened by an easement across his or her property for a water ditch obtain a junior conditional water right at the headgate of that ditch for non-consumptive hydropower use of water that the neighbor is diverting from the stream under a senior water right for irrigation use through that headgate? 1

T2 Applying the no material injury, water availability, and maximum beneficial use principles of Colorado water law, in conjunction with our…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Coffin v. Left Hand Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1882
  3. City of Aurora v. Colorado State EngineerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  4. Fellhauer v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  5. Santa Fe Trail Ranches Property Owners Ass'n v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City & Cty. of Denver v. Consol. Ditches of Water Dist. No. 2Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. Concerning the Application for Water Rights of Tidd: Frees v. TiddSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API