Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Holloway

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1836PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was an action of slander, in St. Clair Circuit Court. The plaintiff, William Holloway, declared against Joel Chandler, in seven counts ; to which, a general demurrer was filed, and overruled: and under the plea of not guilty, a verdict was entered for the plaintiff.

Read the full summary

This was an action of slander, in St. Clair Circuit Court. The plaintiff, William Holloway, declared against Joel Chandler, in seven counts ; to which, a general demurrer was filed, and overruled: and under the plea of not guilty, a verdict was entered for the plaintiff. The counts in the declaration, set out: First — That before the commitment of the several grievances, by the said defendant, after mentioned, a certain man, by the name of Taylor, had died, or been killed, in the county of St. Clair, &c. — and the defendant contriving, &c., — falsely and maliciously spoke of and concerning…

1Opinion of the CourtHopkins, J.

— The action in this case was slander. The plaintiff in error was the defendant in the action. To the declaration, which contains seven counts, he filed a demurrer; that is, according to the statute law, a general one. The judgment which is before us for review", overruled the demurrer. The cause was afterwards tried upon the general issue, and the verdict and judgment were for the plaintiff in the action. Upon a general demurrer to the whole declaration, which contains one good count, and others that are defective, the plaintiff is entitled to judgment, unless there be a misjoinder of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Penry v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Scott v. McKinnishSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  3. Peinhardt v. WestSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Haynes v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  5. Shotwell & Co. v. Gilkey's Adm'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API