Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Liquidation of National Surety Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 29, 1941Published

1DissentDesmond, J.

I agree with Judge Finch’s conclusion that section 29 of the General Corporation Law was inoperative in this situation. I disagree with his conclusion as to the legal effect of the admitted activities of the Superintendent of Insurance in connection with the South Carolina receivership. The Superintendent had an interest in any surplus that might remain of the company’s assets in South Carolina after local claims were satisfied, and the Superintendent quite properly took steps to investigate and protect that interest. On the proof before the referee a question of fact arose as to whether…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Trustees of Amherst College v. RitchNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Bannon v. BannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Marshall v. . MeechNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  4. Britton v. . ScognamilloNew York Court of Appeals · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API