Legal Opinion

Pelouze v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 23, 1945No. Record No. 2915PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGregory, J.

A judgment for $422.59 was rendered against the plaintiff in error, H. L. Pelouze, trading as Pelouze Sales Company, in favor of the City of Richmond, for certain license taxes for the years 1940, 1941, 1942 and 1943.

The case originated by a warrant in the Civil Justice Court of the city of Richmond on the 20th day of October, 1943. An affidavit of substantial defense was made, and under Code, sec. 3102 (Michie), the case was removed to the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond, where it was tried before the judge of that court without a jury, by consent of both parties.

The plaintiff…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McLeod v. J. E. Dilworth Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. McLeod, Comm. of Revenues v. J. E. Dilworth Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  3. Commonwealth v. Smallwood Memorial InstituteSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
  4. Commonwealth v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  5. Dunston v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  2. City of Charleston v. BOARD OF ED., ETC.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Interwest Aviation v. County Board of EqualizationUtah Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API