Legal Opinion
United States v. Turk
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 29, 1991No. Civ. No. HM-89-3161PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HERBERT F. MURRAY, Senior District Judge.
The plaintiff in this civil action is the United States of America. The United States has brought suit against Ellis Turk, M.D. (“Dr. Turk”) seeking civil penalties for violation of the record keeping requirements of the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. §§ 827(a)(3) and 842(a)(5). Dr. Turk is registered with the United States Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) and is certified to dispense certain controlled substances to his patients. During December, 1988, an unannounced “compliance inspection” by the DEA reportedly revealed that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Dombrowski v. EastlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Virginia M. Gutting v. Falstaff Brewing Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States ex rel. Graybar Electric Co. v. Team Construction, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2017
- Kress v. Food Employers Labor Relations Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Citibank (S.D.), N.A. v. Savage (In Re Savage)District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- United States v. RenfrowDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Burger v. HartleyDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.