Legal Opinion
Rainey v. Missouri Utilities Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 5, 1979No. 78-1584PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
This matter came up on separate motions to dismiss, supported by affidavits. The trial court applied Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and treated the motions as motions for summary judgment.
Under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court dismissed the plaintiff’s complaint, which claimed relief under 29 U.S.C. § 301, after a finding that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact, and that the defendants were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The judgment of dismissal was appealed.
The plaintiff, Hubert D. Rainey,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. Raymond A. Porter, Virginia R. Porter and Clifford B. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Washington NEAL Et Al., Appellants, v. SYSTEM BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD) Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Painters Dist. Council No. 2 v. Tiger StripersDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1984
- Bruce v. K-Mart Corp.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1983
- Rainey v. Missouri Utilities CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979