Firo v. State

OPINION

UTTER, Justice.

In a jury trial, appellant was convicted of murder. Punishment was assessed by the court at twenty years imprisonment. We affirm.

In his first ground of error, appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction. Specifically, he argues (1) that his identity was not established beyond a reasonable doubt because none of the witnesses stated that they saw him shoot the deceased, and (2) that the only incriminating evidence introduced by the State was his own uncorroborated confession.

In order to sustain a conviction, the State must prove (1) that…