Legal Opinion

State v. Callahan

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 22, 1985No. 84-229PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

These consolidated cases present the question whether the period of license revocation after a conviction of driving while intoxicated continues until the revokee regains his license or whether it terminates automatically at the end of the court-ordered period of license deprivation. We hold that the revocation continues in effect until the license is regained.

Defendants Robert Callahan and Russell Thornton were each convicted of driving while intoxicated. Callahan was found guilty of a violation of RSA 265:82 (1982) (now codified at RSA 265:82 (Supp. 1983)) in superior court on February 23,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re GambleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Bourne v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1962
  3. State v. BatchelderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Randi Beth Berniger v. Meadow Green-Wildcat Corp., D/B/A Wildcat MountainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. State v. GallagherSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. State v. JacobsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Petition of StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  5. Fielding v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API