Legal Opinion

People v. Ravanell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is no merit to defendant’s claim that he was improperly sentenced as a second violent felony offender (see, Penal Law § 70.04 [1]). In 1967, defendant, then 15 years of age, committed a forcible rape in violation of section 794.01 of the Florida statutes. Pursuant to Florida law, he was tried as an adult, convicted, and sentenced to life imprisonment. Defendant contends that because he was only 15 when the offense was committed in Florida, and because New York law at the time would have precluded imposition of criminal responsibility upon a 15…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MorseNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. BalfourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. People v. WolmartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RayfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. In re Joseph G.New York City Family Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API