Legal Opinion

Inphoto Surveillance, Inc. v. Crowe, Chizek & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 2003No. 1-02-2629PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tully

This case reaches us for resolution of certified questions pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 111. 2d R. 308). Plaintiff, Inphoto Surveillance, Inc., filed a complaint against defendant, Crowe, Chizek and Company, LLR alleging that defendant negligently rendered accounting advice regarding plaintiffs liability for sales taxes in the State of New York. Plaintiff alleged that as a result of the negligent advice it failed to collect sales tax from its customers in New York and incurred a substantial tax burden as a result. Defendant moved to dismiss the complaint alleging that the cause of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. WoodardIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Advincula v. United Blood ServicesIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People Ex Rel. Sherman v. CrynsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Gem Electronics of Monmouth, Inc. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. Department of Human ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Mohammad v. The Department of Financial and Professional RegulationAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. Harris v. Department of Human ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API