Gillespie v. Northridge Hospital Foundation
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KINGSLEY, J.
Plaintiff’s wife was injured while in the employ of defendant. She has recovered the appropriate benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Plaintiff then sued the employer for loss of his wife’s services, 1 alleging the employer’s negligence. A motion for a summary judgment was granted; plaintiff appeals from the resulting judgment. We affirm.
Defendant relies on the language in section 3600 of the Labor Code that liability under the Workmen’s Compensation Act is “in lieu of any other liability whatsoever to any person” (except in cases under section 3706, which is not…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Smither and Company, Inc. v. Franciska T. ColesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- McVey v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1927
- Ash v. S. S. Mullen, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1953
- Guse v. A. O. Smith Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Snyder v. Michael's Stores, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
- Mattison v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- Williams v. State Compensation Insurance FundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Santiago v. Employee Benefits ServicesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.