Legal Opinion

Joseph D. Patton and Constance M. Patton v. Oscar M. Jonas, Collector

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 5, 1957No. 12018PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal-from a determination by the district court that certain payments made by plaintiff taxpayer did not constitute “interest paid * * * on indebtedness * * * ” within the meaning of Section 23(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. 26 U.S.C.A. § 23 (b). This, the only problem with which we are confronted, entails a construction on our part of a contract referred to herein as the Lodgewood-Patton agreement, in order that we may determine whether a debtor-creditor relationship was created thereby. A brief statement of the facts as stipulated follows.

In…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Moore v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
  5. Cumps v. KiyoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DeCleene v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  2. Jules R. Green v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Frederick A. Smith, Deceased, (Consolidated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
  3. Commercial Capital Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  4. DeCleene v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
  5. Donald DeCleene and Doris DeCleene v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API