Joseph D. Patton and Constance M. Patton v. Oscar M. Jonas, Collector
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal-from a determination by the district court that certain payments made by plaintiff taxpayer did not constitute “interest paid * * * on indebtedness * * * ” within the meaning of Section 23(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. 26 U.S.C.A. § 23 (b). This, the only problem with which we are confronted, entails a construction on our part of a contract referred to herein as the Lodgewood-Patton agreement, in order that we may determine whether a debtor-creditor relationship was created thereby. A brief statement of the facts as stipulated follows.
In…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Griffiths v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Moore v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Cumps v. KiyoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- DeCleene v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- Jules R. Green v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Frederick A. Smith, Deceased, (Consolidated)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Commercial Capital Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- DeCleene v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000
- Donald DeCleene and Doris DeCleene v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2000