Rountree v. Todd
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
1. It is insisted by the petitioners that the memorandum of the auctioneer, made in connection with the purported bid of Roy Moore, which was introduced in evidence, was not sufficient to bind the bidder, and that the defendant was not entitled to his commissions unless he could show that he had consummated an enforceable sale of the property for $15,000. Under this theory, it is contended that the court erred in overruling the general grounds of the motion for new trial, in failing to charge that the sales slip offered in evidence, even if signed by Mr. Moore, would not have…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Southern Railway Co. v. O'BryanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Geer v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- City Bank of Macon v. KentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
- Helms v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Watts v. StarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Cuba v. Hudson & Marshall, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
- Childs v. RagoneseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Leggett v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Roberts v. JL TODD AUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.