United States v. Wilfred Page Van Loben Sels
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC
The slip opinion filed December 30, 1999 [198 F.3d 1161], is amended as follows:
At slip opinion page 14995 [198 F.3d at 1162] by changing “2Ql.l(b)(l)(A)” to “2Q1.2(b)(l)(A)”.
At slip opinion page 14998 [198 F.3d at 1164] by changing “2Ql.l(b)(l)(A)” to “2Q1.2(b)(l)(A)”.
At slip opinion page 14999 [198 F.3d at 1164] by changing “2Ql.l(b)(l)(A)” to “2Q1.2(b)(l)(A)”.
At slip opinion page 14996, n.3 [198 F.3d at 1163], immediately preceding the sentence beginning “LAMC § 64.30(b)(1) provides, in pertinent part,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Wilfred Page Van Loben SelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. Technic Services, Inc. And Rick RushingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Technic Services, Inc. And Rick RushingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002