Legal Opinion

United States v. Wilfred Page Van Loben Sels

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 14, 2000No. 98-10355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AMENDING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING AND REHEARING EN BANC

The slip opinion filed December 30, 1999 [198 F.3d 1161], is amended as follows:

At slip opinion page 14995 [198 F.3d at 1162] by changing “2Ql.l(b)(l)(A)” to “2Q1.2(b)(l)(A)”.

At slip opinion page 14998 [198 F.3d at 1164] by changing “2Ql.l(b)(l)(A)” to “2Q1.2(b)(l)(A)”.

At slip opinion page 14999 [198 F.3d at 1164] by changing “2Ql.l(b)(l)(A)” to “2Q1.2(b)(l)(A)”.

At slip opinion page 14996, n.3 [198 F.3d at 1163], immediately preceding the sentence beginning “LAMC § 64.30(b)(1) provides, in pertinent part,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Wilfred Page Van Loben SelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Technic Services, Inc. And Rick RushingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. United States v. Technic Services, Inc. And Rick RushingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API