Capone v. Sloan
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
In many respects, the claims of proof of the parties are in substantial accord. Brubaker Road, in Cheshire, runs generally north and south, and intersects from the north, but does not cross, South Brooksvale Road, which runs generally east and west. The highways are uncurbed, and to some extent each flares at the intersection. The paved portion of Brubaker Road is of a uniform width of about twenty-five feet before it flares out, and that of South Brooksvale Road, about seventeen and one-half feet. Brubaker Road flares out much more than does South Brooksvale Road. The intersection is in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sears v. CurtisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Franks v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Neff v. NeffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
- Leblanc v. GrilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. PiskorskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Terminal Taxi Co. v. FlynnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Gigliotti v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Fasanelli v. TerzoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.