Schweizer Aircraft Corp. v. State Division of Human Rights
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Meyer, J.
This appeal requires that we interpret section 296 (subd 10, par [c]) of the Executive Law which proscribes discrimination in employment because of sabbath observance, but excepts from its proscription an employer other than the State, a political subdivision or a school district "where the uniform application of terms and conditions of attendance to employees is essential to prevent undue economic hardship to the employer”. The subdivision puts the burden of proof on the employer in any proceeding in which applicability of its proscription is in issue. We hold…
2Cited by7 opinions
- MATTER OF GENESEE HOSP. v. State Div. of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. v. McCallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- New York City Transit Authority v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Reinach v. WisehartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- New York City Transit Authority v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.