Legal Opinion

In re O'Neill

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Disciplinary proceedings instituted by the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

1Opinion of the Court

Clarke, P. J.:

The respondent was admitted to the bar in November, 1897, and since that date has practiced and is now practicing in the First Judicial District. The petition alleges that the respondent has been guilty of misconduct, (a) that since 1906 respondent has been engaged almost exclusively in litigation growing out of claims for personal injuries or death and has made it a business to seek litigation of that kind. For that purpose he has had among his employees Jeremiah F. Sullivan, Walter F. Peck and Alexander Wuerz, who are not attorneys and one of whose duties it was to solicit…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Wylde v. Northern Railroad Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  3. Charges of Association of the Bar v. RandelNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Hislop v. TaaffeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mildner v. GulottaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976
  2. In re SibenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. Mildner v. GulottaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API