Legal Opinion

Jones v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 19, 1994No. D021024PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

— In this case, we are asked to decide whether Code of Civil Procedure section 206, subdivision (f) requires the court to provide the defense with addresses and telephone numbers of jurors posttrial upon request. We hold the answer is no, not after jurors have exercised their “absolute right” to refuse to discuss the deliberations or verdict with counsel under subdivision (a).

Factual and Procedural Background

Bryan Maurice Jones (Jones) was charged with murder with special circumstances in the deaths of four women and attempted murder, rape, sodomy and various offenses as to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. HedgecockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. People v. SimmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. TugglesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. People v. DuranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. People v. GranishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. People v. BartonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. CONTRA COSTA NEWSPAPERS, INC. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API