Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gilder v. Meno

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 14, 1996No. 03-95-00080-CVPublished

1DissentJones, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

This is, at its core, a statutory-construction case. There are two simple propositions that control the outcome of this appeal. First, more than a half-century of case law requires that “inter-agency appeals” to the Commissioner of Education be conducted with a new evidentiary hearing. Second, when it was enacted in 1981, the Term Contract Nonre-newal Act (“TCNA”) did not alter that requirement.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The majority’s statement of the factual and procedural background is essentially correct. Gilder was employed by Aquilla Independent School…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. SizemoreTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Firemen's & Policemen's Civil Service Commission v. BrinkmeyerTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API