Legal Opinion

Yeager v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 19, 1947No. 15,648PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

This is a proceeding based on chapter 20, ’35 C.S.A., pertaining to “bastardy,” as the chapter is entitled. Although the statute was enacted in 1879, counsel agree, and our research indicates, that prior to this inquiry, procedural or other construction of the act at our hands has not been sought. Other and later enactments have had our consideration. Wamsley v. People, 64 Colo. 521, 173 Pac. 425; Poor v. People, 67 Colo. 60, 185 Pac. 467; Dikeou v. People, 95 Colo. 537, 38 P. (2d) 772, are examples. Since, the record considered, it is important that we examine the act generally, we set it…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dikeou v. People in the Interest of CassidentiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  2. Wamsley v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  3. Poor v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SaxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  2. Altergott v. YeagerColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Martinez v. LopezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Noffsinger v. SipesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Noffsinger v. SipesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API