Legal Opinion

People v. Johns

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 2002No. 1—01—3429, 1—01—3430 consPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE McBRIDE

delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendants Matthew Johns, Damon Overall 1 and Ronald Chang were charged by indictment with drug offenses. Three days after Overall’s arrest, he filed a motion for protective order requesting preservation of any and all transmissions by the police communications section for a period of an hour and a half preceding the defendant’s arrest and 2½ hours following his arrest — from 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. on the day of his arrest. On the same day the motion was filed, the trial court signed an order preserving the tape recordings of these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. First Capitol Mortgage Corp. v. Talandis Construction Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. NewberryIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. KoutsakisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. People v. C.J.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. KladisAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API