Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cook v. Rezek

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1980No. 12746Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

Rezek’s answer and counterclaim plainly allege false representations of Juffer; the counterclaim alleges concealment of an existing agency between Cook and Juffer.

The issues of fraud and agent misbehavior were not addressed in Cook v. Rezek, 89 S.D. 667, 237 N.W.2d 18 (1975) nor was Juffer a party thereto.

The lower court granted a ■ motion for summary judgment in favor of Juffer and against Rezek based upon the doctrine of res judicata. This was error and I would reverse the trial court.

In Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc., 90 S.D. 263, 276, 240 N.W.2d 102, 109 (1976), this court held that the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keith v. Willers Truck ServiceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Golden v. Oahe Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. American Property Services, Inc. v. BarringerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Fales v. KauppSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Cook v. RezekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API