Legal Opinion

Masaki v. Columbia Casualty Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 1964No. 4365, 4366PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

CASSIDY, J.

This is an action by plaintiff, as named insured under a family multiple line automobile policy issued to him by defendant Columbia Casualty Company, to recover $1,000.00, the full amount permitted under Coverage C of Part II of the policy for medical expenses incurred. The complaint alleges that medical expenses in the reasonable sum of $1,332.00 were incurred on plaintiff’s behalf for which defendant was, subject to the stated monetary limit of the policy, liable.

The controlling provisions of the policy in evidence read as follows:

“COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY
“…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956
  2. Kopp v. Home Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Drearr v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Gordon v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Feit v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sturla, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Dutta v. State Farm InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Bynum v. MagnoHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Standard Oil Co. v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Yamaguchi v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API