Legal Opinion

Rector, Church Wardens & Vestrymen of Church of Holy Trinity v. Melish

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinbrink, J.

(orally). This is an action in equity in which the plaintiffs seek relief, and in which the defendants, other than the Bishop, ask for counterrelief. The unfortunate controversy which has arisen here has found its way into the courts because the parties themselves could not resolve their differences.

*1006In order to determine the legal rights of the parties to this litigation, and growing out of their unfortunate differences, it is necessary to consider questions fundamental in their nature and character. The consideration of these questions is essential in order to acquire a true conception, not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baxter v. . McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Connitt v. Reformed Protestant Dutch Church of New ProspectNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Moyle v. FranzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
  4. Moyle v. FranzNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. S. S. & B. Live Poultry Corp. v. Kashruth Ass'n of Greater New York, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rector v. MelishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  2. Catholic Diocese of Jackson, Mississippi and Joseph R. Kopacz, Bishop of the Catholic Diocese of Jackson v. Arie Mattheus De LangeMississippi Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Melish v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  4. Melish v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API