Anthony v. Krey
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Montgomery, J.) Debt on liquor-dealer’s bond. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff brought suit, under the statutes of this State, against Adolph Krey as principal, and the other two defendants as sureties, upon liquor bonds for the years 1886 and 1887. Krey was a saloon keeper, in the village of Lisbon, Kent county, for these years, and Hubert and Goetz were his sureties upon both bonds. The declaration was in two counts, one for each year, and claimed damages for the sale of liquors in 1886 and 1887 to plaintiff’s husband, Lewis E. Anthony, who was alleged to have been in those years a person in the habit of being intoxicated* It was also averred that liquor…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Franklin v. FreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Bell v. ZelmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Nunnally v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Nunnally v. International Fidelity InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979