Legal Opinion

Dungan v. Dungan

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1979PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FONES, Justice.

These two cases were consolidated on appeal to dispose of a common issue. In the wake of Boddie v. Connecticut, 401 U.S. 371, 91 S.Ct. 780, 28 L.Ed.2d 113 (1971), the judiciary has two choices in providing access to the courts for indigent plaintiffs in divorce cases, where the defendant’s residence is unknown and cannot be ascertained upon diligent inquiry. The question is whether the courts should order the State to pay newspapers for service by publication or authorize a less costly method of substitute service of process that satisfies due process of law.

Both…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Deason v. DeasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Varner v. SkovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Ashley v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Van Tran v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Reginald Dion Hughes v. Tennessee Board of Probation and ParoleTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Brooks v. Board of Professional Responsibility of the Supreme Court of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Blevins v. MowreyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Heck Van Tran v. State of TNTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API