Legal Opinion

Heacock v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 11, 1905No. 13,929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Harper district court; Preston B. Gillett, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Clark A. Smith, J.:

The plaintiff in error brought-this action in the district court of Harper county to-enjoin Hugh Sullivan, as road-overseer, and his assist*751ants, together with J. W. Grigsby, as township trustee, and the board of county commissioners of Harper county from attempting to lay out, and open, a public highway along the section line on the north side of a tract of land owned by plaintiff, adjacent to the city of Attica. The defendants in error claim that there was a legal highway previously laid out, and opened, over the strip of land in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richman v. Supervisors Muscatine CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  2. State ex rel. C. C. & C. Railroad v. WhitesidesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
  3. Carbon Coal & Mining Co. v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1881

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dent v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  2. State v. CipraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Pollock v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API