Tobiassen v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtKuntz, J.
The defendant, Scott K. Tobiassen, appeals his judgment of conviction for first-degree murder and sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. Tobias-sen raises three issues on appeal and we affirm as to two of the issues without further comment. For the third issue, To-biassen argues that a question asked during the booking process relating to his employment violated his federal and state constitutional protections against compelled self-incrimination and, therefore, violated Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). We reject his argument and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Florida v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- GREG SENSER v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- STATE OF FLORIDA v. ROBIN BENDERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2023
- United States v. Terrell Jason ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022