Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Newcastle & Danville Railroad

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1857PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Suit upon a promissory note. The complaint is, “that on the 4th day of February, 1856, the defendant (The Newcastle cmd Dmville Railroad Compcmy), by William Twining, president of said company, who was then and there authorized and empowered by said company so to do, executed her promissory note, and delivered the same to one E. W. Patterson, by which the defendant promised to pay him, or order, the sum of four thousand dollars, according to the tenor and effect of said note.” The complaint then alleges the assignment of the note to the plaintiff, its non-payment, and demands judgment for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sparks v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  2. Richardson v. St. Joseph Iron Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1839

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. National State Bank v. Sandford Fork & Tool Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Board of Commissioners v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Miller v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Elkins v. Camden & Atlantic RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1882
  5. Liberty Township Draining Ass'n v. BrumbackIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API